Kipyatkov's paintings can be divided into several large thematic series: sports, agriculture, railway, sea, workers, which immediately recalls memories of exhibitions of the Soviet era. At that time, such topics as labor, military and revolutionary history, the Olympics were presented at grand republican and all–Union expositions of social realism artists who made a successful professional and public career. Nevertheless, Kipyatkov's style, combining figurative painting and abstraction, refers rather to the beginning of the last century. At that time, a number of luminaries of modernism, from Picasso to Malevich, after experiments with abstractionism turned back to various forms of realism.
"Realism" is a word that came back in the names of the wave of exhibitions that swept through metropolitan and provincial Russian museums and galleries in 2016 under the influence of dynamically changing socio-political realities. In this context, the work of the young master is interesting for an art historical analysis.
Kipyatkov's presentation of the main topics differs. For example, the motif of agriculture, an activity immersed in native substances, is naturally presented in the most abstract manner. Here, the space ripples after Malevich, shimmers and chirps after Khlebnikov ("Rural Cosmos", "Russian Women", "Ploughmen"), or on the contrary, painting is reduced to lapidary and clearly organized forms ("Sprouts", "Nest", "Harvest"). The disciplined technical world of the railway is constructed by rhythmic way in plastic, reminiscent of Matyushin's color forms (Series "Railway"). The theme of the sea is presented in the most figurative and, at the same time, romantic way, making us to recall the Soviet book illustration and textile design of the 1920s ("Dreams", the series "Icebreakers" and "Tankers").
Indeed, Kipyatkov's painting, which operates with a rich artistic heritage of various styles and schools, provides a vast field of associations for the art historian. They go from Art Nouveau and Klimt, to Suprematism and Filonov, and further through Labas and Deineka, to the post-war painting of Paris school and Leningrad art of the "new wave" of the 1980s and 1990s - this list can be refined and continued. But, having such postmodern baggage, Kipyatkov's painting is distinguished from the bulk of contemporary art by the absence of drama, cleverness, a sense of "double bottom" in the work, crisis and critical motives, supposed to be necessary for "actual" art.